CA-D 24/7: Review?


Local resident Gillian Mosely has written to Cllr Jones to request a review of the decision to keep the hours of operation of the CA-D unchanged. Our ward councillors Julian Fulbrook and Sue Vincent have also commented. 

Cllr Jones replied, "This issue has been considered carefully and in great detail in recent months and the decision-making process was concluded last week at the special meeting held in public. The consultation results were clear and the issues around the validity of the consultation and whether it makes sense to redraw the CPZ boundaries have already been answered in email correspondence with councillors and at the public meeting.

The council does not have the resources to reopen a new decision-making process on this the week after it was decided - this would divert money and officer time away from delivering much needed environmental and transport improvements needed by Camden residents. In any case, Camden council has clear policies on sustainable transport and prioritisation of road user needs and I am confident that the decision taken was in line with these long-established policies and the evidence on what local residents want.

The matter is therefore concluded, however the review of the P&D bays will proceed as explained in the report."

The consultation was originally planned by council officers for next year. Cllr Jones had it brought forwards due to local concerns and the lobbying by our ward councillors. He says he would have agreed to 24/7 parking controls if the consultation had come out in favour.

Here is a link to the decision-making report.  You can read for yourself the underlying issues and consultation results:


Cllr Sue Vincent has written asking for the 24/7 decision to be reviewed:

I have concerns regarding the apparent policy to encourage drivers into central London, and the unintended consequence of increasing pollution and congestion. You state that to
temporarily change Pay and Display bays into Residents’ bays within a CPZ, then this would have an adverse effect on the ability of businesses in the area to operate.
·         Can you let me know what adverse effect you think residents have on businesses and the environment when they are circulating the area, anecdotally (but can confirm my own previous personal experience) for 45-60 minutes?
·         What evidence do you rely on to state that businesses are adversely impacted if a P&D is temporarily changed?
Phil, can we re-view this policy and ensure that every time a resident bay is suspended that the closest P&D bay is changed to resi for the equivelent time?  I know the council hold data that gives income per P&D bay; this average income can be passed on as a charge to the applicant for any suspension.   Can we discuss please?

More News

Are You Dickensian?

The Charles Dickens Museum is seeking three people to join its non-executive Board in spring 2020. They're keen for local residents to get involved.   Being a Board member of the Charles Dickens Museum is a voluntary unremunerated role, although expenses (such as travel for attending required meetings) may...
Read More

Posted 13 Nov 2019

Increase in Resident Parking Permit Charges

This April Camden is going to raise the cost of resident parking permits. The declared reason for this is "to reduce car ownership, car use and motor traffic levels" and "discouraging inessential car ownership and use". HV asked Camden for a definition of inessential car ownership and use. Here's...
Read More

Posted 25 Mar 2019

A message from Cllr Fulbrook

Sometimes there is a silver lining… The Mayor of London had ambitious plans to part-pedestrianise Oxford Street and to tackle the appalling congestion at the infamous Swiss Cottage gyratory, but  Westminster City Council fought off both schemes with vigour. So the £50 million can go elsewhere. And Camden...
Read More

Posted 5 Mar 2019